MERV 13 vs. HEPA Filters: What’s the difference?

Indoor air pollution can be two to five times higher than outdoor air pollution.

This pollution can cause a range of health issues, including allergies, asthma, and respiratory problems. Air filtration is essential to remove harmful particles from the air and to maintain a healthy indoor environment.

MERV 13 and HEPA filters are both designed to filter the air, but they differ in terms of their efficiency and the size of particles they can capture.

MERV 13 filters are rated to remove 90% of particles that are 1 micron or larger, while HEPA filters are rated to remove 99.97% of particles that are 0.3 microns or larger.

This means that HEPA filters are more efficient at capturing smaller particles such as allergens, bacteria, and viruses.

Additionally, HEPA filters are required to meet strict government standards, whereas MERV 13 filters do not have a standardized certification process.

However, MERV 13 filters are still effective at removing larger particles such as dust, pollen, and pet dander, and they are often less expensive than HEPA filters.

MERV 13 Filters

MERV 13 filters are highly efficient at capturing and removing a wide range of airborne particles from indoor air.

These filters are capable of capturing particles as small as 0.3 microns with a minimum efficiency of 50%, including bacteria, smoke, and other contaminants.

Additionally, MERV 13 filters can capture particles between 1.0 and 3.0 microns with a minimum efficiency of 85%, such as pet dander, pollen, and mold spores.

The high level of filtration provided by MERV 13 filters makes them a popular choice for hospitals, commercial buildings, and residential homes, where maintaining good indoor air quality is important.

These filters can effectively reduce the spread of allergens and pollutants, making them especially beneficial for individuals with allergies, asthma, or other respiratory conditions.

MERV RatingAverage Particle Size Efficiency in Microns
1-43.0 – 10.0 less than 20%
53.0-10.0 greater than or equal to 20%
63.0-10.0 greater than or equal to 35%
73.0-10.0 greater than or equal to 50%
81.0-3.0 greater than or equal to 20%
3.0-10.0 greater than or equal to 70%
91.0-3.0 greater than or equal to 35%
3.0-10.0 greater than or equal to 75%
101.0-3.0 greater than or equal to 50%
3.0-10.0 greater than or equal to 80%
110.30-1.0 greater than or equal to 20%
1.0-3.0 greater than or equal to 65%
3.0-10.0 greater than or equal to 85%
120.30-1.0 greater than or equal to 35%
1.0-3.0 greater than or equal to 80%
3.0-10.0 greater than or equal to 90%
130.30-1.0 greater than or equal to 50%
1.0-3.0 greater than or equal to 85%
3.0-10.0 greater than or equal to 90%
140.30-1.0 greater than or equal to 75%
1.0-3.0 greater than or equal to 90%
3.0-10.0 greater than or equal to 95%
150.30-1.0 greater than or equal to 85%
1.0-3.0 greater than or equal to 90%
3.0-10.0 greater than or equal to 95%
160.30-1.0 greater than or equal to 95%
1.0-3.0 greater than or equal to 95%
3.0-10.0 greater than or equal to 95%
High-efficiency Particulate Air filter HEPA*99.97% of particles in the 0.3-micron range
Particles that are larger or smaller than 0.3 microns are captured with a greater than 99.97% efficiency
Table data from the EPA’s website

HEPA filters

HEPA is a specialized type of air filter that uses a pleated mechanical design to capture and remove airborne particles.

The acronym HEPA stands for “high-efficiency particulate air [filter],” as officially defined by the U.S. Department of Energy.

HEPA filters are incredibly effective at capturing even the smallest airborne particles.

In fact, they can remove at least 99.97% of particles that measure as small as 0.3 microns in diameter. This particle size is known as the most penetrating particle size (MPPS) and is considered the most challenging size to capture.

HEPA filters are so efficient that particles that are larger or smaller than the MPPS are trapped with even greater effectiveness.

Therefore, the worst-case particle size is used to determine the filter’s worst-case efficiency rating, which guarantees a minimum of 99.97% efficiency for all particle sizes.

Overall, HEPA filters are an essential component of many air filtration systems, particularly in settings where air quality is critical, such as hospitals, laboratories, and industrial facilities.

Their high level of filtration makes them an excellent choice for anyone who wants to improve indoor air quality and reduce the spread of airborne pollutants.

Comparison of MERV 13 and HEPA Filters

The following table provides a comprehensive comparison between MERV 13 and HEPA air filters, highlighting their key features, filtration efficiencies, and common applications.

FeatureMERV 13 FilterHEPA Filter
Filter TypeMechanical air filterMechanical air filter
Efficiency RatingMERV 13 (Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value)HEPA (High Efficiency Particulate Air)
Particle Size Capture0.3-10 microns0.3 microns (99.97% efficiency)
Filtration Efficiency50-85% for 0.3-1.0 microns, 85%+ for 1.0-3.0 microns, 90%+ for 3.0-10 microns99.97% for 0.3 microns or larger
Common ApplicationsResidential and commercial HVAC systems, hospitals, schoolsCleanrooms, hospitals, labs, sensitive environments
Airflow ResistanceModerateHigh
Lifespan3-6 months (depending on usage)12-24 months (depending on usage)
CostLess expensiveMore expensive
MaintenanceRegular replacement requiredRegular replacement and proper sealing required
Viruses and Bacteria FiltrationModerate efficiencyHigh efficiency
Allergen FiltrationEffective for pollen, mold spores, dust, pet danderEffective for pollen, mold spores, dust, pet dander, and smaller particles
Smoke and Smog FiltrationLimited effectivenessEffective
Odor ReductionLimitedLimited (both filters require activated carbon for effective odor reduction)
Comparative Analysis of MERV 13 and HEPA Air Filters

Efficiency and particle size capture range

HEPA filters have a minimum efficiency of 99.97% for particles as small as 0.3 microns, which includes the most common indoor pollutants like allergens, dust mites, and pet dander.

They are also capable of capturing smaller particles, such as viruses, bacteria, and mold spores, with a higher efficiency rating than MERV 13 filters.

This is due to their dense filter media, which is composed of tightly packed layers of fine fibers that can trap small particles.

MERV 13 filters, on the other hand, have a minimum efficiency of 50% for particles as small as 0.3 microns, and a minimum efficiency of 85% for particles between 1.0 and 3.0 microns.

This means that they are effective at capturing common indoor pollutants, but may not be as effective at capturing smaller particles like viruses.

Airflow and energy consumption

HEPA filters are more restrictive than MERV 13 filters, meaning they can reduce airflow and put more strain on HVAC systems.

This restriction can lead to higher energy consumption and reduced efficiency over time. MERV 13 filters are less restrictive and generally have less of an impact on airflow and energy consumption.

Cost and maintenance

HEPA filters are typically more expensive than MERV 13 filters, both in terms of the initial purchase cost and ongoing maintenance costs.

This is due to their higher efficiency and more advanced filter media. HEPA filters also tend to have a shorter lifespan than MERV 13 filters, which means they need to be replaced more frequently.

MERV 13 filters are generally more affordable and have a longer lifespan, which can help offset their slightly lower efficiency compared to HEPA filters.

Suitability for various applications

HEPA filters are typically used in environments where air quality is critical, such as hospitals, laboratories, and clean rooms.

They are also used in industrial and manufacturing settings where air quality can impact product quality or worker safety.

MERV 13 filters are more commonly used in residential and commercial HVAC systems, where they can effectively capture a wide range of indoor pollutants and improve indoor air quality.

For example, in a hospital setting where preventing the spread of infection is critical, HEPA filters may be the preferred choice due to their higher efficiency at capturing viruses and bacteria.

In a residential setting, however, MERV 13 filters may be an appropriate choice for reducing common indoor pollutants like dust, pollen, and pet dander.

Where are MERV 13 or HEPA filters used?

MERV 13 and HEPA filters are used in a variety of settings where air quality is important.

However, the specific filter chosen will depend on the application and the level of air contamination that needs to be addressed. Here are some examples of settings where MERV 13 or HEPA filters may be used:

MERV 13 filters are commonly used in residential and commercial HVAC systems to improve indoor air quality.

They are effective at capturing common indoor pollutants like dust, allergens, and pet dander, and can help reduce the risk of respiratory issues and other health problems.

MERV 13 filters are also used in hospitals and healthcare facilities, where they can help reduce the spread of airborne viruses and bacteria.

They are effective at capturing particles as small as 0.3 microns, including most bacteria and viruses.

However, in critical healthcare settings like operating rooms and isolation rooms, HEPA filters may be preferred due to their higher filtration efficiency.

HEPA filters are commonly used in environments where air quality is critical, such as clean rooms, laboratories, and manufacturing facilities.

They are capable of capturing particles as small as 0.03 microns with a minimum efficiency of 99.97%, making them highly effective at removing a wide range of contaminants from the air.

HEPA filters are also used in residential and commercial settings where indoor air quality is a top priority, such as in homes with residents who have severe allergies, asthma, or other respiratory conditions.

They can effectively capture a wide range of indoor pollutants, including mold spores, pollen, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

Overall, the choice between MERV 13 and HEPA filters will depend on the specific needs and requirements of the environment in question.

Conclusion

When deciding between MERV 13 and HEPA filters, it’s important to carefully consider the specific needs and requirements of the environment.

Factors to consider include the size and type of HVAC system, the level of air contamination, and the budget for filter replacement and maintenance.

Ultimately, the goal is to choose a filter that provides the best balance of filtration efficiency, airflow, and cost-effectiveness for the specific application.

By taking the time to evaluate these factors and make an informed decision, it’s possible to improve indoor air quality and promote better health and well-being for occupants.